• Mandating platforms and issuers to provide clear, concise risk warnings and disclosures will ensure that investors comprehend the inherent risks associated with crowdfunding investments, enabling them to make informed decisions.

Country Examples

Link to United Arab Emirates case studies
United Arab Emirates
Link to European Union case studies
European Union
  • Introducing caps on the size of crowdfunding issues and individual investment amounts mitigates the potential for disproportionate losses, safeguarding investors from overexposure to risk. A range of jurisdictions have implemented such caps.

Country Examples

Link to United States case studies
United States
  • To limit exposure of inexperienced investors to risky crowdfunding investments, some regulators are introducing limits on how much they can invest. There are generally two main approaches to setting investment limits: imposing a fixed monetary amount or requiring the cap to be calculated by reference to a prospective investor’s circumstances, such as their income or assets.

Country Examples

Link to United Kingdom case studies
United Kingdom
Link to Malaysia case studies
Malaysia
Link to Türkiye case studies
Türkiye
  • Requiring platform operators to conduct thorough investor appropriateness or suitability assessments ensures investors possess the requisite knowledge, experience, and financial capacity to engage in crowdfunding, minimizing the likelihood of inappropriate investments. Common techniques employed include running an entry knowledge test or simulations to gauge ability to bear losses. Some jurisdictions have mandated both investor tests and loss simulation for prospective investors. New EU regulation requires not only an entry knowledge test for prospective investors1 but also that operators require prospective investors to simulate their ability to bear loss2.
  • Implementing cooling-off periods affords investors a window of opportunity to reconsider their investment decisions without penalty, promoting rational decision-making and reducing the incidence of impulsive investments. While many regulators seem to agree on the value of a cooling-off period, there seems to be no common approach on the time frame within which such a right should be allowed to be exercised. In Italy, the cooling-off period starts on the day an investor subscribes to the offer and lasts seven days3. In Australia, the cooling-off period lasts up to five days after subscribing to the offer (making an application),4 while in Malaysia, it is six days5.
Notes:

1. EU Regulation 2020/1503 of 7 October 2020 on European crowdfunding service providers for business, art. 21 (2).

2. EU Regulation 2020/1503 of 7 October 2020 on European crowdfunding service providers for business, art. 21 (2).

3. Resolution no. 18592 of 26 June 2013 (Italy).

4. Corporations Amendment (Crowd-sourced Funding) Act 2017 (Australia), s. 738ZD and ASIC, Crowd-Sourced Funding: Guide for Companies (Regulatory Guide 261), June 2020, 261.83.

5. Guidelines on Recognized Markets SC-GL/6-2015(R3-2019) (Malaysia), Rule 13.08.