Speed and friction in concluding the loan agreement

Automation makes for contact-free, frictionless digital credit. Consumers value the anonymity and impersonal nature of borrowing through digital channels. Insights from users of M-Shwari and M-Pawa show that consumers perceive that the use of a private, digital channel that does not require the consumer to interact with a human intermediary enables them to avoid harassment, corruption and social pressure.1

Automation shortcuts human intervention, adding speed and certainty – but also removing a key barrier to bad credit choices.2The risk here is that inappropriate credit products may be pushed on the client through apps and that the absence of a human intermediary or other source of friction can make bad outcomes more likely.

The recommendation of many researchers, taken up by several regulators, is to slow down the process of transacting digitally to allow consumers more time for deliberation. This might involve, for example, adding intermediate steps, a review screen, or a cooling-off period.3 Interposing delays and extra steps so as to improve digital credit outcomes has come to be known as “positive friction.”4 The aim is “to intentionally slow users and shift them out of automatic thinking to allow them to make more considered decisions that can help achieve positive consumer outcomes.”

Recommendation: Policymakers can encourage the use of positive friction in digital credit to support their consumer protection objectives. Possible ways to support positive friction through consumer protection policy measures include:

  • Pricing transparency and disclosure rules that provide for an extra review of terms and conditions or comprehension tests to improve consumer understanding of their loan obligations.
  • Cooling-off and withdrawal provisions that help consumers reflect on their product choices and gather more information.
  • Increased protections for vulnerable populations, such as the ability to self-protect from using a digital credit product during periods of vulnerability or for undesired behaviors (e.g., gambling).
  • Enhancing product suitability by requiring providers to seek additional information from customers about their personal and business activities, or their borrowing needs, during the loan application process.

Country examples of positive friction

Link to European Union case studies
European Union
Link to India case studies
India
Link to Latvia case studies
Latvia
Link to Mexico case studies
Mexico